waiting to send decision to author npj

The npj Series journals require an Author Contribution Statement that specifies the individual contributions of each co-author. Improve the chances of your manuscripts acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. Figure lettering should be in a clear, sans-serif typeface (for example, Helvetica); the same typeface in the same font size should be used for all figures in a paper. Authors must provide adequate data to support their assignment of identity, purity and homogeneity for compounds and materials described in the manuscript. When plotting data, we require authors to use a format that clearly shows the full data distribution. 2022.12.13 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision #1hhhh . The science editor has sole responsibility for the decision to accept or reject a manuscript, and that decision is final. March 29, 2023 Approved human gene symbols are provided by HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC), e-mail: hgnc@genenames.org; see also www.genenames.org. Data availability statements should provide a statement about the availability of the minimal dataset that would be necessary to interpret, replicate and build upon the methods or findings reported in the article. Most journals assign a manuscript number upon initial submission and send an automated notice to advise you of the number (if not now, the manuscript number will be assigned when the first editor is assigned). When submitting a final manuscript for publication, all figures must be uploaded as separate figure files ensuring that the image quality and formatting conforms to the specifications below. What happens after my manuscript is accepted? [CDATA[// > Under Creative Commons licences, authors retain copyright in their work. Authors are encouraged to consider the needs of colourblind readers (a substantial minority of the male population) when choosing colours for figures. Authors are encouraged to include both completed forms at the time of submission. Please consult the appropriate nomenclature databases for correct gene names and symbols. When all remaining editorial issues are resolved, the paper is formally accepted. All authors must also complete an editorial policy checklist to ensure compliance with Nature Portfolio editorial policies. The following types of contribution to npj Series journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Brief Communications, Case Report, Comment, Matters Arising, Meeting Report, Perspective, Protocol, Resource, Reviews. Alternatively, they can be supplied as a separate supplementary data file (ideally as a plain, unformatted text file). In the event of publication, the received date is the date of submission to npj Vaccines. |021-54481353 Safety hazards posed by reagents or protocols should be identified clearly. (1), 147-153. Supplementary Information is not edited, typeset or proofed, so authors should ensure that it is clearly and succinctly presented at initial submission, and that the style and terminology conform to the rest of the paper. J. | SCI | | | | | | PMC . Copies of any papers containing related work that are under consideration or in-press at other journals should be included with the submission as additional supplementary information. As part of our efforts to improve transparency in authorship, we ask all corresponding authors of accepted papers to provide their Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier (ORCID) ID, before submitting the final version of the manuscript. Hi, it depends from the Journal but normally you can wait more days. Commercial suppliers of reagents or instrumentation should be identified. Please note that schemes are not used; sequences of chemical reactions or experimental procedures should be submitted as figures, with appropriate captions. [CDATA[> When appropriate, figures should include error bars. Should your manuscript be accepted, you will receive more extensive instructions for final submission of display items. Hi, I have submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal. Authors must state whether a number that follows the sign is a standard error (s.e.m.) In particular, when you submit a . But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. A competing interests statement is required for all accepted papers published in the npj Series journals. npj Series referee reports, whether signed or not, are subsequently shared with the other Reviewers. Author CD serves as [Editor role title] of this journal and had no role in the peer-review or decision to publish this manuscript. Please use initials to refer to each author's contribution in this section, for example: "FC analyzed and interpreted the patient data regarding the hematological disease and the transplant. criteria that authors should consider before submitting papers to npj Digital Medicine. The Methods section should be subdivided by short bold headings referring to methods used and we encourage the inclusion of specific subsections for statistics, reagents and animal models. A copy of the checklist can also be downloaded on our policies page. This is known as a rescinding. If there is no competinginterest, a statement declaring this is still required. Codes and software should be available and properly referenced in the article and/or supplementary information. There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably availability of article referees. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. References are numbered sequentially as they appear in the text, methods, tables, figure legends. When can I expect a decision from the Editor? We cannot offer to provide corrected reprints with higher image quality if only poor quality images were supplied at accept stage. Chem, 2016, 1 (1), 147-153. (()--2020-0033) Approved mouse symbols are provided by The Jackson Laboratory, e-mail: nomen@informatics.jax.org; see also www.informatics.jax.org/mgihome/nomen. Reviewers have been invited and the peer review process is underway. , If the authors have successfully addressed all the comments of the Reviewers and the Editors, the Editors will deem the paper acceptable for publication in npj Vaccines. After acceptance, changes to the manuscript may be made so that papers conform to our style. Schott, D. H., Collins, R. N. & Bretscher, A. Secretory vesicle transport velocity in living cells depends on the myosin V lever arm length. Comprehensive information on the statistical analyses used must be included in the paper. ISSN 2059-0105 (online), https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio/about/npj-series, a list of all journals in the Nature portfolio and subject areas. 156, 35-39 (2002). 5 months is a really long time for a paper to be under the status of "Editor Assigned". Responses to requests for admissions are due within 30 days after service, except that a defendant may serve a response within 45 days after service of process and the initial pleading on that defendant. As part of Nature Portfolio, npj Clean Water follows common policies as detailed via the menu on the left that our authors and prospective authors must follow. If you would like to submit a suggestion for the featured image on our homepage with the final version of your manuscript, please also include the Image Licence to Publish form. When creating and submitting digital files, please follow the guidelines below. Any previously unreported custom computer code or scripts used to generate results reported in the manuscript that are central to the main claims must be made available to Editors and referees upon request. Small sample size: When the sample size is small (less than about 10), authors should use tests appropriate to small samples or justify their use of large-sample tests. Please refer to our editorial policies for more information. Based on the Reviewer recommendations, you can use the action buttons to make a decision. How long does a paper remain at the 'Decision in Process' status? Revised Submission Nearly all manuscripts are returned to the author with suggestions for revision, condensation, or final polish. An Editor is assigned to the manuscript. ->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision Unusual units or abbreviations should be spelled out in full or defined in the legend. 0, :3.0 | :25.0IF6.0NCBI, 310 Figures that do not meet these standards will not reproduce well and publication may be delayed until we receive high-resolution images. The submission remains at this status until you select "Build PDF for Approval". At this point the status of your article will change to 'Completed' and no further modifications can be made in Editorial Manager. Note that once completed reviews for your submitted article have been received and are under evaluation by the handling Editor the status may later return to 'Under Review' if additional reviews are sought. Many colourblind readers cannot interpret visuals that rely on discrimination of green and red, for example. 0, , However, it might be a good idea to send in a reminder to the editor as this can sometimes help quicken the process. 23, 11 Are you sure you do not want to provide feedback? Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. Research articles in Life Sciences, Health Sciences, Earth and Environmental Sciences, and Social and Behavioural Sciences must include relevant details about several elements of experimental and analytical design. Use of an LLM should be properly documented in the Methods section (and if a Methods section is not available, in a suitable alternative part) of the manuscript. | 50decision sent to authorwaiting for revisionFigure 2 DavidUCSDfacetime50"f**king awesome" About the editorial process: As there are many steps involved in the editorial process, this may in some cases take longer then you had anticipated. Suitably high resolution figures may be inserted within the text at appropriate positions or grouped at the end. Once a manuscript is accepted, the corresponding author will be asked to sign a Licenceto Publish and arrange payment of any applicable article processing charge on behalf of all authors. Notably an attribution of authorship carries with it accountability for the work, which cannot be effectively applied to LLMs. If the decision is negative, the author can choose to transfer their manuscript to another journal. Preprint archives do not compromise novelty. Manuscripts published in the npj Series journals are not subject to in-depth copy editing or display item redrawing as part of the production process. Published conference abstracts, numbered patents and research datasets may be included in the reference list. At submission, authors may suggest referees; these suggestions are often helpful, although they are not always followed. A useful resource is Entrez Gene, available from NCBI. Any practical issues preventing code sharing will be evaluated by the Editors who reserve the right to decline the manuscript if important code is unavailable. The primary affiliation for each author should be the institution where the majority of their work was done. 2.25, :25.040, 40 Publishing Open Access will mean the paper is freely accessible online immediately upon publication. "But sending the abortion drug through the . Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? Author: NPJ Tornado Warning Issued - March 30, 2022; 11:21AM. [CDATA[// >